http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/ Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:54:01 -0500 MyBB http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6313 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:27 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6313 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6312 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:25 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6312 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6311 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:25 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6311 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6310 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:23 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6310 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6309 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:13 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6309 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6308 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:59:10 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6308 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6307 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:59:10 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6307 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6306 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:27:58 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6306 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6305 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:39:13 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6305 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6304 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:39:12 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6304 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6303 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:08:33 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6303 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6302 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:33:28 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6302 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6301 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:01:06 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6301 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6300 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:18:08 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6300 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6299 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:17:55 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6299 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6298 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:43:48 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6298
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:21:00 PDT at http://phonearena.com/htmls/Digg-like-se..._2995.html]]>
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:21:00 PDT at http://phonearena.com/htmls/Digg-like-se..._2995.html]]> http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6297 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:41:52 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6297 We know you're not really down with digesting any more catchphrases, but the technology formerly known as Ultra Low Power Bluetooth / Wibree is now being dubbed Bluetooth low energy. Now that we're clear on nomenclature, you may be thrilled to know that CSR showcased its recently unveiled BlueCore7 dual mode (Bluetooth low energy and Bluetooth v2.1) chip at a Bluetooth SIG Medical Working Group meeting. According to onlookers, the handset was able to transfer data to another nearby mobile using just 3 frequencies rather than 32, resulting in an unquantifiable decrease in power consumption. Sounds like a winner on the surface, but we have this weird that mass adoption of this tech is like, years away.Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments




Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:17:00 PDT at http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/...343264390/]]> We know you're not really down with digesting any more catchphrases, but the technology formerly known as Ultra Low Power Bluetooth / Wibree is now being dubbed Bluetooth low energy. Now that we're clear on nomenclature, you may be thrilled to know that CSR showcased its recently unveiled BlueCore7 dual mode (Bluetooth low energy and Bluetooth v2.1) chip at a Bluetooth SIG Medical Working Group meeting. According to onlookers, the handset was able to transfer data to another nearby mobile using just 3 frequencies rather than 32, resulting in an unquantifiable decrease in power consumption. Sounds like a winner on the surface, but we have this weird that mass adoption of this tech is like, years away.Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments




Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:17:00 PDT at http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/...343264390/]]> http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6296 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:09:14 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6296
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:39:00 GMT at http://feeds.cellphoneforums.net/~r/cpf8...ewbie.html]]>
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:39:00 GMT at http://feeds.cellphoneforums.net/~r/cpf8...ewbie.html]]> http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6295 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:09:08 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6295



Posted on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:13:00 PDT at http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/...343153866/]]>



Posted on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:13:00 PDT at http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/...343153866/]]> http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6294 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:36:21 -0500 http://www.mobile-phones4u.net/showthread.php?tid=6294
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:24:52 GMT at http://feeds.cellphoneforums.net/~r/cpf8...phone.html]]>
Posted on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:24:52 GMT at http://feeds.cellphoneforums.net/~r/cpf8...phone.html]]>